Holding the right to recall to keep our elected leaders on toes seems to be a nice idea which might improvise our democracy. But we should not forget practical and theoretical problems with it.
Practical Problems
1. To recall a person, we need to have elections periodically every six months or so. And the election burden will be a problem.
2. Lets say, money is no issue and EC is conducting elections periodically so that we can recall our previously elected MP. And lets say we recalled the present fellow who is from a party and elected a guy from another party. So this is going to change the share of each party periodically in the parliament. So no party will have the guarantee to hold majority seats in parliament for 5 years, so each govt is highly unstable and our news papers will be filled with ally-formations and we will have hard time to remember who is holding a particular ministry at that time. As each govt comes with its own agenda , we will not move in a particular direction for more than six months or so. If you been following the politics of karnataka, just imagine the same scenario at the center, then you will get the picture.
Theoretical problem is , though we call our MP's representatives, they are primarily our leaders who we trusted with our votes and next 5 years of time. Voting means , giving somebody the authority to make laws behalf of me. The one elected is the one who is trusted by many. And he will participate in law making and we should obey those laws, that is the deal with representative democracy. But its not a lifetime opportunity. If we are not satisfied with the way he made laws we will have the chance to recall and elect another one for every five years. So we are giving 5 years of chance for an elected govt to prove its worth and show some results, because thats the least time any govt would take to make a policy and implement it and the results to be visible. Those representatives are not delegates to recall whenever we feel like, just like the diplomats to other nations. The delegate is the one who acts like a branch office or a messenger or to do a particular task. Delegates dont have authority.
We just cant recall a person only because he voted for construction of dam in my locality which will swallow my farmland. But the construction of dam might provide water to lacs of hectors of land in some other village. Should my MP be punished because he helped my fellow Indians in next district or village? Of course he should be punished if he cant get me a proper compensation money.
But, there is good news too. Some economists say, one of the reasons India was not affected the earlier recession is the 2009 general elections. Because election time is the time politicians bring their black money and distribute. So money was flowing in our country at the time of elections. If this right to recall comes to force, black money will be flowing with every election. But there is a catch, as each politician doubt being a MP for more than six months, he will be more corrupt to get all the spent money on elections back. We choose another one, and there is a fat chance that he is also corrupt, so we end up having more corrupted MP's in rotation than now.
Practical Problems
1. To recall a person, we need to have elections periodically every six months or so. And the election burden will be a problem.
2. Lets say, money is no issue and EC is conducting elections periodically so that we can recall our previously elected MP. And lets say we recalled the present fellow who is from a party and elected a guy from another party. So this is going to change the share of each party periodically in the parliament. So no party will have the guarantee to hold majority seats in parliament for 5 years, so each govt is highly unstable and our news papers will be filled with ally-formations and we will have hard time to remember who is holding a particular ministry at that time. As each govt comes with its own agenda , we will not move in a particular direction for more than six months or so. If you been following the politics of karnataka, just imagine the same scenario at the center, then you will get the picture.
Theoretical problem is , though we call our MP's representatives, they are primarily our leaders who we trusted with our votes and next 5 years of time. Voting means , giving somebody the authority to make laws behalf of me. The one elected is the one who is trusted by many. And he will participate in law making and we should obey those laws, that is the deal with representative democracy. But its not a lifetime opportunity. If we are not satisfied with the way he made laws we will have the chance to recall and elect another one for every five years. So we are giving 5 years of chance for an elected govt to prove its worth and show some results, because thats the least time any govt would take to make a policy and implement it and the results to be visible. Those representatives are not delegates to recall whenever we feel like, just like the diplomats to other nations. The delegate is the one who acts like a branch office or a messenger or to do a particular task. Delegates dont have authority.
We just cant recall a person only because he voted for construction of dam in my locality which will swallow my farmland. But the construction of dam might provide water to lacs of hectors of land in some other village. Should my MP be punished because he helped my fellow Indians in next district or village? Of course he should be punished if he cant get me a proper compensation money.
But, there is good news too. Some economists say, one of the reasons India was not affected the earlier recession is the 2009 general elections. Because election time is the time politicians bring their black money and distribute. So money was flowing in our country at the time of elections. If this right to recall comes to force, black money will be flowing with every election. But there is a catch, as each politician doubt being a MP for more than six months, he will be more corrupt to get all the spent money on elections back. We choose another one, and there is a fat chance that he is also corrupt, so we end up having more corrupted MP's in rotation than now.
2 comments:
I think its not difficult to find a counter algorithm for any algorithm (procedure). :D
if only real world is like programming world, like in matrix :D
Post a Comment